Salt water acclimatisation strengthens the skin of post-smolt salmon

Photo of author

By Milthon Lujan

Norway – New research shows that Atlantic salmon post-smolt skin that has become acclimatised to salt water is stronger than the skin of post-smolt that have been raised in fresh water before being transferred to the sea. Salt water acclimatisation makes the salmon more resistant to the skin ulcer bacterium called Tenacibaculum.

Wound problems in the Norwegian aquaculture industry are complex, but many of the problems are related to the initial period when fish are transferred to the sea, and some of the wounds are caused by an ulcerative bacterium infection called Tenacibaculum. This bacterial genus causes tenacibaculosis, but the disease hasn’t yet been given a common name. The occurrence of wounds and Tenacibaculum are most prevalent in Northern Norway due to its lower ocean temperatures.

Previously, Nofima has discovered suppression of immunity in salmon during the time of smoltification. Therefore, the salmons’ resistance to infections may be reduced, causing them to be more susceptible to disease when transferred to the sea. Nofima’s fish health scientists have now been involved in testing this in relation to bacterial infection and seawater acclimatisation, and student Marte Fredriksen at the University of Bergen (UiB) has just submitted her master’s thesis based on the trials.

In the trials organised by Cermaq R&D and UiB, the scientists tested various smolt production strategies, testing them in relation to Tenacibaculum susceptibility. Normally, post-smolt are transferred directly from fresh water to seawater shortly after smoltification. Other strategies include keeping the fish in fresh water for longer periods, or adding salt water before transferring them to the sea. In connection with these trials, Nofima took samples of smolt before and after infection. This was done to investigate what happens in the skin when fish are infected.

Tested what happens when fish are infected

The trials were carried out at the Industrial and Aquatic Laboratory (ILAB) in Bergen. After the fish were smoltified, post-smolt weighing 70 grams, 100 grams and 150 grams, in both fresh water and in brackish water (26 parts per thousand of salt), were transferred to seawater and infected with the Tenacibaculum bacterium.

See also  What shall we feed the cleaner fish?

Fredriksen used various histological tools to investigate where in the tissue the bacterium was located. The scientists also wanted to find out how the infection starts and what might affect it.

More tissue damage in freshwater fish

The study showed that the skin of salmon farmed in freshwater developed differently compared to the fish reared in brackish water. The surface of the skin of the freshwater salmon was also weaker than the skin of the brackish water salmon when transferred to seawater, explains Christian Karlsen, an aquamedicine scientist at Nofima and Fredriksen’s supervisor:

“The most obvious effect was more damage to the epidermis of the freshwater fish, which worsened when the fish became infected. By putting this in context with the trial’s mortality rates, we believe that the transition to full-strength seawater is a greater strain on freshwater fish than on brackish water fish.

This suggests that the fish can be acclimatised to seawater by keeping them in brackish water before transferring to seawater, therefore reducing the risk of tenacibaculosis.”

Structural skin differences

Studies of the salmons’ gene expression involving the different water qualities showed that the skin seems to prioritise immune defence responses at the expense of cell and tissue maintenance and development.

“The low-salinity fish are most likely better at mobilising their immune systems when they come into contact with the bacteria. The freshwater skin is slightly in shock and can’t gather itself to respond well enough in order to cope with the bacteria”, believes Karlsen.

Can the industry adapt production?

Cermaq R&D is the project’s work package manager and industry partner, and Cermaq’s Sverre Bang Småge will put the knowledge about water quality and ulceration into production:

See also  More documentation needed for the efficacy of cleaner fish

“This project adds further strength to the hypothesis that prolonged time in purified seawater before transferral provides a number of benefits, both during the land phase and also later on in relation to the performance, health and welfare of the fish”, says Småge.

“One of the most important things in order for the fish to avoid infection is that the skin is intact, and we can influence that”, says Karlsen.

You can also see a film on skin health from Nofima’s fish health scientists here:

Contact person
Christian Renè Karlsen
Phone: +47 411 47 162

Lene Sveen
Phone: +47 64 97 04 12

Source: Nofima

Leave a Comment