How much tuna can I eat a week before I need to worry about mercury?

Photo of author

By Milthon Lujan

file 20220208 23 mcta7k.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1

Simon Apte, CSIRO and Chad Jarolimek, CSIRO

For as little as A$1 a tin, canned tuna is an excellent, affordable source of protein, polyunsaturated fats and other nutrients. A tin of tuna is significantly cheaper than many types of fresh meat or fish.

Sounds good, but how much can you eat before you need to worry about mercury?

According to Food Standards Australia New Zealand:

It is safe for everyone (including pregnant women) to consume canned tuna as part of their fish intake.

Canned tuna generally has lower levels of mercury than tuna fillets because smaller tuna species are used and the tuna are generally younger when caught.

But how many tins a week?

Lab tests we did for the ABC TV science program Catalyst in 2015 suggest – depending on your body weight and the exact brand of tuna you buy – you could eat anywhere between 25 and 35 small tins (95g each) of tuna a week before you hit maximum mercury limits.

That’s a level even the most keen tuna-lover would be hard pressed to consume.

How does mercury end up in fish anyway?

Mercury is naturally present in our environment but can biomagnify to relatively high concentrations in fish – particularly predatory fish.

In other words, it builds up as smaller fish get eaten by middle-sized fish, which get eaten by large fish, which get eaten by us. So the bigger the fish, the higher the likely mercury content.

Most forms of mercury are potentially very toxic to humans. But to make matters worse, a substantial proportion of mercury in fish is present as methylmercury – a potent neurotoxin formed by bacteria in waters and sediments.

See also  New international study shows alternative seafood networks provided resilient diversity during pandemic

Although mercury pollution has increased since industrialisation, accumulation of methylmercury in animals is a completely natural phenomenon.

Even fish caught from the middle of the ocean, far from any polluting sources, will contain methylmercury.

file 20220307 84943 1py9m1z.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
Tinned tuna is cheap, tasty and nutritious. Shutterstock

Tuna in Australian cupboards is likely smaller species

Over the years, some scientists have raised concerns about high concentrations of mercury in canned tuna.

Mercury concentrations are higher in predatory fish such as tuna and generally increase with age and size. So this concern has largely been associated with the use of tuna species such as albacore and larger tuna specimens.

Skipjack and yellowfin are the main tuna species listed as ingredients in canned tuna in brands sold at Australian supermarkets.

Skipjack are the smallest of the major tuna species, while yellowfin are larger.

So, the fact the canned tuna in Australian cupboards is likely to contain smaller species is already a bonus when it comes to reducing mercury risk.

But let’s drill down to the details.

How much mercury can we have?

According to Food Standards Australia New Zealand:

Two separate maximum levels are imposed for fish ― a level of 1.0 mg mercury/kg for the fish that are known to contain high levels of mercury (such as swordfish, southern bluefin tuna, barramundi, ling, orange roughy, rays and shark) and a level of 0.5 mg/kg for all other species of fish.

However, whether mercury is harmful or not also depends on the amount of fish you eat and how often. After all, it is the dose that makes the poison.

See also  EUMOFA: The EU Fish Market - 2022 Edition

Based on international guidelines, Food Standards Australia New Zealand also provides recommended safe limits for dietary intake. In other words, how much mercury you can safely have from all food sources (not just fish).

This limit is known as the “provisional tolerable weekly intake” or PTWI.

The maximum dose of mercury set for the general population is 3.3 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per week. 1,000 micrograms (µg) is 1 milligram (mg).(The guidelines assume all mercury in fish is present as the more harmful methylmercury as a worst case scenario).

The dose for pregnant women is approximately half this value – 1.6 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per week).

Pregnant women are advised to limit their fish intake because of placental transfer of mercury to the unborn foetus and the effect of mercury on neural development.

file 20220307 25900 1outlwh.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
Whether mercury is harmful or not also depends on the amount of fish you eat and how often. Shutterstock

Testing three tins

Our laboratory is well equipped to measure mercury concentrations in fish. As part of the Catalyst program in 2015, we analysed mercury concentrations in Australian fish including three tins of canned tuna purchased from the supermarket.

Given the very low sample numbers, our data is just a snapshot of mercury concentrations. More research is clearly needed.

We found none of the canned tuna brands exceeded the safe consumption levels for mercury of 0.5 milligrams of mercury a kilogram. All three tins had slightly different levels of mercury but even the “worst” one wasn’t that bad.

You would have to eat around 25 tins (at 95g a tin) of it a week before you hit the maximum tolerable intake of mercury. For pregnant people (or people trying to get pregnant), the limit would be around 12 tins (at 95g a tin) a week.

See also  Analysing the stomach content and gut microbiome of tuna using molecular techniques, UC study paints a near real-time snapshot of Pacific Ocean ecosystem

It is unlikely many consumers will reach these limits.

But watch out for other species of fish

Some Australian fresh fish can contain higher mercury concentrations than canned tuna.

Food Standards Australia New Zealand recommends that, for orange roughy (also known as deep sea perch) or catfish, people should limit themselves to one 150 gram serving a week with no other fish that week. For shark (flake) or swordfish/broadbill and marlin, the limit is one serving a fortnight.

Simon Apte, Senior Senior Principal Research Scientist, CSIRO and Chad Jarolimek, Senior Experimental Scientist, CSIRO

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Leave a Comment